Friday, April 4, 2008

Wistful Abandonment

There are a lot of abandoned farmhouses in Iowa.
Ever since I was a kid, seeing the ghostly remains of a house would sadden me. Not just your average - gee, isn't that too bad - kind of sad, but a visceral mourning for what once was and is no more. Sometimes I'd see just an empty lot rimmed with day lilies in the middle of a soybean field; the only monument left to mark where a family once lived and worked and played. Were they happy? When did they leave the farm? How many children played in that yard?
Now I live in a city, albeit it a small one, in a run-down neighborhood where most houses are rental properties and almost all suffer from years of neglect. My house was built in 1914; a foursquare in what was then undoubtedly an upscale suburb. We have put more than $40,000 into this old house, with tens of thousands more needed to repair and replace, remodel and resurface. My house deserves every penny we have put into it. It has original stained glass windows, gorgeous floors (those that we've been able to refinish so far), woodwork that would be prohibitively expensive to make today, and grand pillars inside and outside.
But there is a street in my neighborhood that is deteriorating rapidly. One house has nearly been torn apart just within the last year. It seems that as soon as a rental property is left vacant, it is vandalized. The first to go are the windows, then even the aluminum siding is stripped off to sell.
I certainly don't understand the vandalism or what kind of life experience leads someone to enjoy destroying.
But what bothers me even more is that the city allows landlords to simply abandon properties; at least it seems as if they have been abandoned.
Des Moines, as do most cities nationwide, has a growing population of homeless people. The current mortgage crisis will turn more families than ever out into the street. The waiting lists for low-income rental housing are prohibitively long. Yet Des Moines allows empty houses to be desecrated beyond repair. Why are property owners allowed to leave an empty house to simply disintegrate? Why isn't there a program to condemn these properties before they are severely damaged, sell them at auction for renovation or take them over and contract out the renovation?
Every time I walk past these houses, I am overwhelmed with sadness. Maybe someday someone in power will recognize the value of using and repairing what we already have.
Maybe someday, these once proud houses, where families lived, some happily and, undoubtedly, some not, will again be called "home."

3 comments:

zamozo said...

Karen, don't click on that link. Another blogger reported getting spam comments that had links to viruses or something.

You need to set it so that commenters have to type in the distorted letter/number codes in order to comment.

Mama Podkayne said...

AGH! That is the VIRUS link. Don't check out their blog either. It starts the download automatically.

In other news......I can speak for hours about why the city doesn't work on these old houses. I helped start a program a couple years ago to get the use of emminant domain or take the houses back on taxes. Usually banks own the properties and if you can get them involved before the damage starts, the better.

I personally have boarded up neighboring houses with my own money and resources just to save them. And kept watch for urban miners. That is key. Then you have to be proactive finding someone to fall in love with the house and save it.

Reasons that the city program failed? Non-profit misusing $$. Out of state owners fighting the legality of seizing private property (they buy houses on tax sale and use as write off.....).

It's tricky.
Then the market sucks right now so it is harder to get a loan, harder to sell a rehabbed house, higher chance of foreclosure......

Anonymous said...

Seeing old run down houses- esp. farm houses- makes me so sad as well. I like to photgraph them whenever possible and imagine how beautiful they must have looked when they were built